Let's take a closer look at what happens when we call fahr_to_celsius(32.0)
. To make things clearer, we'll start by putting the initial value 32.0 in a variable and store the final result in one as well:
original = 32.0
final = fahr_to_celsius(original)
The diagram below shows what memory looks like after the first line has been executed:
When we call fahr_to_celsius
, Python doesn't create the variable temp
right away. Instead, it creates something called a stack frame to keep track of the variables defined by fahr_to_kelvin
. Initially, this stack frame only holds the value of temp
:
When we call fahr_to_kelvin
inside fahr_to_celsius
, Python creates another stack frame to hold fahr_to_kelvin
's variables:
It does this because there are now two variables in play called temp
: the parameter to fahr_to_celsius
, and the parameter to fahr_to_kelvin
. Having two variables with the same name in the same part of the program would be ambiguous, so Python (and every other modern programming language) creates a new stack frame for each function call to keep that function's variables separate from those defined by other functions.
When the call to fahr_to_kelvin
returns a value, Python throws away fahr_to_kelvin
's stack frame and creates a new variable in the stack frame for fahr_to_celsius
to hold the temperature in Kelvin:
It then calls kelvin_to_celsius
, which means it creates a stack frame to hold that function's variables:
Once again, Python throws away that stack frame when kelvin_to_celsius
is done and creates the variable result
in the stack frame for fahr_to_celsius
:
Finally, when fahr_to_celsius
is done, Python throws away its stack frame and puts its result in a new variable called final
that lives in the stack frame we started with:
This final stack frame is always there; it holds the variables we defined outside the functions in our code. What it doesn't hold is the variables that were in the various stack frames. If we try to get the value of temp
after our functions have finished running, Python tells us that there's no such thing:
print 'final value of temp after all function calls:', temp
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NameError Traceback (most recent call last)
<ipython-input-12-ffd9b4dbd5f1> in <module>()
----> 1 print 'final value of temp after all function calls:', temp
NameError: name 'temp' is not defined
final value of temp after all function calls:
Why go to all this trouble? Well, here's a function called span
that calculates the difference between the mininum and maximum values in an array:
import numpy
def span(a):
diff = a.max() - a.min()
return diff
data = numpy.loadtxt(fname='inflammation-01.csv', delimiter=',')
print 'span of data', span(data)
span of data 20.0
Notice that span
assigns a value to a variable called diff
. We might very well use a variable with the same name to hold data:
diff = numpy.loadtxt(fname='inflammation-01.csv', delimiter=',')
print 'span of data:', span(diff)
span of data: 20.0
We don't expect diff
to have the value 20.0 after this function call, so the name diff
cannot refer to the same thing inside span
as it does in the main body of our program. And yes, we could probably choose a different name than diff
in our main program in this case, but we don't want to have to read every line of NumPy to see what variable names its functions use before calling any of those functions, just in case they change the values of our variables.
The big idea here is encapsulation, and it's the key to writing correct, comprehensible programs. A function's job is to turn several operations into one so that we can think about a single function call instead of a dozen or a hundred statements each time we want to do something. That only works if functions don't interfere with each other; if they do, we have to pay attention to the details once again, which quickly overloads our short-term memory.
We previously wrote functions called fence
and outer
. Draw a diagram showing how the call stack changes when we run the following:
print outer(fence('carbon', '+'))
Let's start by creating some simple heat maps of our own using a library called ipythonblocks
. The first step is to create our own "image":
from ipythonblocks import ImageGrid
Unlike the import
statements we have seen earlier, this one doesn't load the entire ipythonblocks
library. Instead, it just loads ImageGrid
from that library, since that's the only thing we need (for now).
Once we have ImageGrid
loaded, we can use it to create a very simple grid of colored cells:
grid = ImageGrid(5, 3)
grid.show()
Just like a NumPy array, an ImageGrid
has some properties that hold information about it:
print 'grid width:', grid.width
print 'grid height:', grid.height
print 'grid lines on:', grid.lines_on
grid width: 5
grid height: 3
grid lines on: True
The obvious thing to do with a grid like this is color in its cells, but in order to do that, we need to know how computers represent color. The most common schemes are RGB, which is short for "red, green, blue". RGB is an additive color model: every shade is some combination of red, green, and blue intensities. We can think of these three values as being the axes in a cube:
An RGB color is an example of a multi-part value: like a Cartesian coordinate, it is one thing with several parts. We can represent such a value in Python using a tuple, which we write using parentheses instead of the square brackets used for a list:
position = (12.3, 45.6)
print 'position is:', position
color = (10, 20, 30)
print 'color is:', color
position is: (12.3, 45.6)
color is: (10, 20, 30)
We can select elements from tuples using indexing, just as we do with lists and arrays:
print 'first element of color is:', color[0]
first element of color is: 10
Unlike lists and arrays, though, tuples cannot be changed after they are created --- in technical terms, they are immutable:
color[0] = 40
print 'first element of color after change:', color[0]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TypeError Traceback (most recent call last)
<ipython-input-11-9c3dd30a4e52> in <module>()
----> 1 color[0] = 40
2 print 'first element of color after change:', color[0]
TypeError: 'tuple' object does not support item assignment
If a tuple represents an RGB color, its red, green, and blue components can take on values between 0 and 255. The upper bound may seem odd, but it's the largest number that can be represented in an 8-bit byte (i.e., 28-1). This makes it easy for computers to manipulate colors, while providing fine enough gradations to fool most human eyes, most of the time.
Let's see what a few RGB colors actually look like:
row = ImageGrid(8, 1)
row[0, 0] = (0, 0, 0) # no color => black
row[1, 0] = (255, 255, 255) # all colors => white
row[2, 0] = (255, 0, 0) # all red
row[3, 0] = (0, 255, 0) # all green
row[4, 0] = (0, 0, 255) # all blue
row[5, 0] = (255, 255, 0) # red and green
row[6, 0] = (255, 0, 255) # red and blue
row[7, 0] = (0, 255, 255) # green and blue
row.show()
Simple color values like (0,255,0)
are easy enough to decipher with a bit of practice, but what color is (214,90,127)
? To help us, ipythonblocks
provides a function called show_color
:
from ipythonblocks import show_color
show_color(214, 90, 127)
FIXME: color image
It also provides a table of standard colors:
from ipythonblocks import colors
c = ImageGrid(3, 2)
c[0, 0] = colors['Fuchsia']
c[0, 1] = colors['Salmon']
c[1, 0] = colors['Orchid']
c[1, 1] = colors['Lavender']
c[2, 0] = colors['LimeGreen']
c[2, 1] = colors['HotPink']
c.show()
Fill in the ____
in the code below to create a bar that changes color from dark blue to black.
bar = ImageGrid(10, 1)
for x in range(10):
bar[x, 0] = (0, 0, ____)
bar.show()
Why do computers use red, green, and blue as their primary colors?
Will changing the nesting of the loops in the code above --- i.e., wrapping the Y-axis loop around the X-axis loop --- change the final image? Why or why not?
Why did we transpose our data outside our heat map function? Why not have the function perform the transpose?
Why does the heat map function return the grid rather than displaying it immediately? Do you think this is a good or bad design choice?